Beer Fridge – A Case Study in Thermal Design. Part 3 – Side Up or Upside Down?
The futility of investigating the cooling effectiveness of any empty fridge is beginning to dawn on me, the irony of which is matched only by my new-years-resolution-inspired-sobriety. Never mind, let’s see this particular study through… Whether in a beer ridden fury or in moments of Galilean scientific investigation, you might find yourself kicking the fridge over on to its side or even lifting it up and plonking it upside down. The door is tightly closed so why would the potential beercoolingosity in any way be affected? Let’s find out.
As shown in the first blog in this series, the TEC only cools a small metal plate on the bottom face of the inside of the fridge. Air next to the plate is going to be the coldest inside the fridge, getting warmer the further away from the plate it gets. Even the most ardent non-engineer should know that ‘hot air rises’ (and ‘heatsinks’ but that’s another story…). With the fridge upright and the cold plate on the bottom of the inside of the fridge the cold air just sits at the bottom with the warmer air stagnating above it. Once the fridge is on its side or upside down the air cooled by the plate dumps down to the bottom of the fridge mixing things up inside.
The main effect of this is to reduce the average air temperature. After a couple of assembly rotations and subsequent simulation conducted in FloTHERM, the following chart shows the effect of the rotations.
If you hail from the US, Burma or Liberia and thus do not officially use or mandate a metric system of units then you’d be more familiar with:
Either way, an empty electronic fridge sure doesn’t get that cold.
In a little more detail, here are the temperature variations within the fridge, as predicted by FloTHERM:
The mixing effects of the cold dumping air can be seen when you start to animate the airflow inside the fridge (note I’ve reduced the temperature range to go from 14 to 16 degC, blue is =<14, red is => 16 to clearly show the hot air (rising) and the cold air (sinking), note that the speeds are not to ‘scale’):
Think about the inverse of the problem; even my dog would intuitively know that putting a radiator on the ceiling would not be the best way to heat a room. There is more to product design than just thermal however. Simplicity leading to a reduction in manufacturing costs is going to be a biggie. The structural instability of having the heatsink, fan etc. on the top would maybe increase the risk of litigation. The point is is that such small fridges are not designed to be empty. Stock it full of beer cans and you might think it would not get as cold everywhere. You might have to think again…
4th January 2011, Ross-on-Wye
Read the Rest of this Series
- Facebook Live Event on Tuesday July 11th – Frontloading CFD: How and Why?
- SEMI-THERM 33 – ‘A History of Commercial CFD’ Short Course
- Talking CFD Podcast – Democratization, Appification and Strategy
- A Novel Approach to Reducing Heatsink Mass Whilst Preserving Thermal Performance, using FloTHERM
- Response Surface and Sequential Optimisation of a Heatsink Using FloTHERM. Part 6 – Response Surface Models
- Response Surface and Sequential Optimisation of a Heatsink Using FloTHERM. Part 5 – Sequential Optimisation and Compound Cost Functions
- Response Surface and Sequential Optimisation of a Heatsink Using FloTHERM. Part 4 – Response Surface Inspection
- Response Surface and Sequential Optimisation of a Heatsink Using FloTHERM. Part 3 – Cost Function Response Surfaces
- Happy Lunar New Year! – FloEFD Investigates Sky Lantern Aerodynamics
- Response Surface and Sequential Optimisation of a Heatsink Using FloTHERM. Part 2 – Design of (Computational) Experiments