Preserving Expertise

Like many youth since time began and there were pianos to play, my daughter takes piano lessons. In musical ways, she is much like her mom. Both play piano and sing beautifully. And like her mom, my daughter’s talent is several notches above average, at the level that leaves you wanting to hear more when each piece is over.

I recently attended a recital to listen to my daughter and her fellow students perform their latest practice numbers. As events go, these recitals are rather relaxed affairs. Audience and performers filter in and out as their personal schedules allow. Students perform in roughly beginner-to-advanced order. Musical numbers range from Twinkle Twinkle Little Star-class tunes to much more complicated pieces by the likes of Chopin and Mozart. With many years of lessons to her credit, my daughter is nearer the “more seasoned, so let’s play harder pieces” end of the skill spectrum. From beginning to end, the recital was a nice affair and a great way to spend an early fall evening. As the event drew to a close, however, we were in for an unexpected surprise.

When all students finished playing their prepared pieces, the piano teacher stood to conclude the recital and announce refreshments. Before turning us loose on the pot-luck treat table, however, she requested a few minutes more of our time to share a Chopin number she’s working on. Even though we were already 90 minutes into our evening, no one dissented. She is the teacher, after all, carefully nurturing the musical talents of our children. What followed was the true treat of the evening.

I estimate the teacher is near sixty years old, plus or minus a few years. I say this to suggest but two things: she has played the piano for a very long time, and that despite her well-earned expertise, advancing years have a way of softening even the sharpest of talents. But when she laid fingers to keyboard, she performed as every bit the expert she is. Her fingers, though bent with a bit of early stage arthritis, literally danced up-and-down the keyboard. She showed why she is the teacher, the master, in her studio. She played with so much feeling that even those (like myself) who generally avoid classical music and stare at their watches or smart phones impatiently awaiting the final note, put down their electronic distractions and listened with eyes closed, savoring every note. A real treat indeed. Such performances are rarely preserved in recording, but I’ve since realized that the piano teacher is, quite literally, preserving her skill in each of her students. While all may not reach her skill level, some no doubt will go on to play the same piece, at the same rhythm and speed, inspiring their own listeners to set aside life’s distractions and listen to the simple beauty of music well played.

The piano teacher’s performance reminded me of a recent presentation I attended from one of my colleagues, an engineer as expert in simulation and modeling as the piano teacher is in matters musical. It turns out that many companies are concerned about a sort of ‘technical brain drain’ in their staff — a particularly troubling issue for companies that develop and support big things like automobiles, airplanes, and space stations to name a few. Systems in these categories last for years, often decades, so it’s not unusual for members of original design teams to move on to other projects or companies, or perhaps even retire, leaving behind little more than printed specifications, schematics, and perhaps lab notebooks. During his presentation, my colleague proposed that modeling and simulation is a way to preserve engineering expertise for any system. Along with specifications and schematics, development teams could archive models and simulation results. Future design teams would then have the benefit of a fully functional virtual model to illustrate how a system works. If you think about it, his proposal makes perfect sense. What better way to pass along system knowledge than with a functioning system model and a complete simulation database. It’s the engineering equivalent of piano lessons.

Just as my daughter’s piano teacher passes a bit of her expertise along to each student through piano lessons, design teams can pass along their system expertise through models and simulation. Both are effective methods for knowledge transfer. Whether we have musical aptitude or not, we can all learn a little from a piano teacher’s example.

Post Author

Posted October 29th, 2012, by

Post Tags

, , , ,

Post Comments

No Comments

About Mike Jensen's Blog

Views, insights, and commentary on mechatronic system design and analysis. Mike Jensen's Blog


Add Your Comment


April 2015
  • Simulation for Test
  • December 2014
  • Motor Down
  • October 2014
  • Reliability vs Robustness
  • June 2014
  • Wow Factor
  • May 2014
  • SystemVision 5.10.3
  • March 2014
  • IESF 2014: Military & Aerospace
  • Engineering Oops!
  • Big Engineering
  • January 2014
  • SystemVision Model Wizard
  • December 2013
  • SystemVision 5.10.2
  • Modeling: An Engineer’s Dilemma
  • October 2013
  • What is Your Legacy?
  • September 2013
  • Automotive IESF 2013
  • July 2013
  • Simple Design Solutions
  • June 2013
  • SystemVision 5.10
  • May 2013
  • Engineering Muscle Memory
  • EDA vs. Windows 8
  • March 2013
  • VHDL-AMS Stress Modeling – Part 3
  • January 2013
  • VHDL-AMS Stress Modeling – Part 2
  • VHDL-AMS Stress Modeling – Part 1
  • December 2012
  • Practice! Practice!
  • November 2012
  • Sharing Tool Expertise
  • October 2012
  • Preserving Expertise
  • Virtual Prototyping — Really?
  • Innovations in Motion Control Design
  • September 2012
  • Game Changers
  • Do We Overdesign?
  • August 2012
  • Tsunami Remnants
  • July 2012
  • A New Look at Device Modeling
  • SystemVision 5.9
  • June 2012
  • Veyron Physics
  • May 2012
  • Rooster Tail Engineering
  • April 2012
  • Automotive IESF 2012
  • Teaching and Learning CAN Bus
  • March 2012
  • Analog Modeling – Part 6
  • Analog Modeling – Part 5
  • Analog Modeling – Part 4
  • February 2012
  • Analog Modeling – Part 3
  • Analog Modeling – Part 2
  • January 2012
  • Analog Modeling – Part 1
  • Connecting Tools and Processes
  • December 2011
  • Turning-Off and Tuning-In
  • Use vs. Experience
  • Analyzing the Big Picture
  • November 2011
  • Simulating for Reliability
  • October 2011
  • SystemVision 5.8
  • VHDL-AMS Model Portability — Fact or Fiction?
  • September 2011
  • IESF 2011 Moves to Frankfurt
  • Simulation Troubleshooting
  • August 2011
  • Qualities of VHDL-AMS Quantities
  • Military & Aerospace IESF 2011
  • Touring Johnson Space Center
  • July 2011
  • Engineering versus Science
  • June 2011
  • System Reengineering
  • May 2011
  • Integrating Hardware and Software Design
  • Engine Remote Start
  • Integrated System Design
  • Simulation Experiments (Part 3)
  • April 2011
  • Automotive IESF 2011
  • Pushbutton Cars
  • System Simulation with FEA-Base Motor Models
  • March 2011
  • Simulation Experiments (Part 2)
  • Simulation Experiments (Part 1)
  • Japan: Patience and Grace Amid Disaster
  • Top Gear = Driving Fun
  • February 2011
  • Buoyancy
  • Ideas in Motion
  • January 2011
  • The Mechanical Half of Mechatronics
  • Detroit Auto Show
  • Signal-flow vs Conserved System Modeling
  • SystemVision 5.7…Ready, Set, Go!
  • December 2010
  • SystemVision and Windows 7
  • Friction Vacation
  • Simulation Beyond Volts and Amps (Part 4)
  • November 2010
  • Simulation Beyond Volts and Amps (Part 3)
  • Simulation Beyond Volts and Amps (Part 2)
  • Simulation Beyond Volts and Amps (Part 1)
  • October 2010
  • SAE Convergence Recap (and an Unexpected Surprise)
  • VHDL-AMS Black Belt
  • Converging on SAE Convergence
  • System Design vs System Repair
  • September 2010
  • What’s the “AMS” in VHDL-AMS?
  • How Sensitive is Your System?
  • Do You Trust Your Simulator?
  • August 2010
  • What’s in a SPICE Model?
  • Cycling + Gravity = Pain
  • NI Week: Fun for Engineers
  • June 2010
  • Are You a Flexible Thinker?
  • VHDL-AMS and Switch Hysteresis
  • May 2010
  • VHDL-AMS Revisited
  • Segway to U3-X
  • Atomic Glue
  • March 2010
  • IESF Recap
  • February 2010
  • IESF is Coming…
  • System Level HDL-topia
  • January 2010
  • Mastering Design Abstraction
  • The Joy of Disassembly