How much do ‘U-Value’ good thermal insulation? Part V

Why is it that when you increase a cavity air gap size beyond ~30mm is there no subsequent detrimental affect on the overall U-Value? Why is it that the U-Value of the cavity gap nearly doubles when the air gap reduces to such as size so as to stagnate the air? Questions that come begging after observing the FloVENT simulation results discussed in the previous blog posting. Let’s find out….

When I started this blog I had some pretty conceited expectations as to what I would find out. You never learn anything by getting things right first time. Stagnant air is a great insulator, moving air isn’t. So why is it that when the cavity air gap size reduces does the overall thermal resistance (R-Value, inverse of U-Value) decrease? The answer is in the gap size. A conductive thermal resistance = d/kA, where d is the length the heat flows, k is the thermal conductivity of the material through which it flows and A is the cross section area of the heat flow. Stagnant air might have a low k but to achieve stagnation you have to have a real small d. So small in fact that the overall thermal resistance is much smaller than when you have a bigger gap and moving air (which has a much higher effective thermal conductivity).

It’s often good to think of moving air as a solid object but with a very high thermal conductivity but you have to be careful about what subsequent insights you gain from such a convective->conductive analogy. Heat that flows (due to conduction) in a material with an isotropic thermal conductivity (same in all directions) will always flow in the direction of the temperature gradient imposed across it. When looking at heat flow in fluids (convection) the heat flows predominantly in the direction of the air flow. [A more involved definition would get into Peclet number; which this isn't; so it won't]

To better understand the physics of the air and heat flow in the cavity the following figure shows what’s going on as the gap size goes from 1mm right the way up to 100mm. It only shows a small vertical section of the wall, about half way up. Both air speed and heat flux are represented by arrows. The size of the arrow represents the magnitude of the air speed (m/s) or heat flow (W/m²).

airspeed_heatflux_in_cavity

For the smallest air gap the air is not moving, the heat flux passes through the gap as if it were completely solid. As the gap size increases to 10mm the air starts to move albeit very slowly. Instead of the heat passing perpendicularly through the gap the air takes some of the heat upwards, turns round at the top of the cavity (not shown) and passes back down the outer wall where it then conducts outwards. Some of the heat still conducts through the air, some is convected around in a big loop. The net effect is for the heat flux arrows to be angled to the right, upwards due to convection, left to right due to conduction. From 50mm and above all the heat is transferred by convection. The heat flux vectors all point in the direction of the air flow.

Going back to the ‘moving air can be viewed as a solid with a conductivity’ analogy, the conductivity is such that it is high in the direction of air flow. Instead of the heat passing left to right through the gap when the gap is very small, when the gap increases so that the air can move, it has to travel all the way up one side of the cavity and all the way down the other. The overall distance the heat travels is not the gap size, it is effectively twice the room height. Viewing air as a solid with a conductive resistance = d/kA, the d is now very big, the A is now half the cavity plan area and the k (by some rough and ready observation looking at the W/m² in the air flow and the temperature gradient in the air flow direction) comes out at about 10,000 times higher than when the air is stagnant. So, even though moving air has a very high effective thermal conductivity, the overall thermal resistance increases because the increased distance and reduced cross sectional area the heat has to travel through are more dominant factors.

OK Robin, you’ve just about managed to ramble through your explanation as to why the thermal resistance increases (U-Value decreases) once the gap is big enough for the air to start moving. What about the fact that beyond ~30mm gap size the overall thermal resistance does not alter, what say you to that?

Let’s carry on with this conductive analogy. This big loop the heat travels along, up one side, down the other; once the gap size increases beyond 30mm the maximum air speed in the cavity does not increase. This can be seen from the final three air speed vector plots in the above figure. There is stagnant air in the middle of this recirculation come a 100mm gap but so what, the heat is still going up one side and down the other. The total distance the heat travels is about the same give or take the 180degree turns at the top and bottom of the cavity.

Convection and conduction are not the only ways in which heat can pass through the wall construction. Radiation has had a bad press (for obvious reasons) but when it comes to radiative heat transfer it’s something that can play a very important role. More on that next time!

2nd March 2010, Nottingham

Post Author

Posted March 2nd, 2010, by

Post Tags

, , , , ,

Post Comments

1 Comment

About Robin Bornoff's blog

Views and insights into the concepts behind electronics cooling with a specific focus on the application of FloTHERM to the thermal simulation of electronic systems. Investigations into the application of FloVENT to HVAC simulation. Plus the odd foray into CFD, non-linear dynamic systems and cider making. Robin Bornoff's blog

Comments

One comment on this post | ↓ Add Your Own

Commented on March 4, 2010 at 7:24 am
By Chris Hill

I think modelling is wonderful;

http://www.mathstat.uottawa.ca/~rsmith/Zombies.pdf

Bit of a tangent, I know, but…

Add Your Comment

Archives

September 2014
  • Xilinx Patent for Critical Tj Prediction
  • Dell Precision – Spot on Thermal Design
  • Top 10 FloTHERM V10 Features – #11: Odds and Sods
  • Top 10 FloTHERM V10 Features – #10: Improved Solar Calculator
  • Top 10 FloTHERM V10 Features – #9: Data Center Simulation
  • August 2014
  • Top 10 FloTHERM V10 Features – #8: Thermostatic Control with Hysteresis
  • July 2014
  • Top 10 FloTHERM V10 Features – #7: Super-fast Parallel CFD Solver
  • June 2014
  • Top 10 FloTHERM V10 Features – #6: Integrated Summary Columns
  • Top 10 FloTHERM V10 Features – #5: FloSCRIPT
  • Top 10 FloTHERM V10 Features – #4: Updated CAD
  • Top 10 FloTHERM V10 Features – #3: FEA Interfacing
  • February 2014
  • Top 10 FloTHERM V10 Features – #2: Advanced Find
  • Top 10 FloTHERM V10 Features – #1: New GUI
  • January 2014
  • Come and Learn about the Latest Release of FloTHERM, V10
  • Heat Your Home Office for 8p a Day. Part 5 – Putting it All Together
  • December 2013
  • Heat Your Home Office for 8p a Day. Part 4 – Comfort Temperature
  • Heat Your Home Office for 8p a Day. Part 3a – Was Dave Right?
  • November 2013
  • Heat Your Home Office for 8p a Day. Part 3 – It Takes Time
  • Heat Your Home Office for 8p a Day. Part 2 – Thermal Interception
  • Heat Your Home Office for 8p a Day. Part 1 – Really?
  • Happy 25th Birthday FloTHERM !
  • July 2013
  • Why Not Just Shove a Heatsink on Top of it? Part 3: Pads, Vias and Undersinking
  • May 2013
  • Why Not Just Shove a Heatsink on Top of it? Part 2: Heat Flow Budgets
  • Why Not Just Shove a Heatsink on Top of it? Part 1
  • April 2013
  • Experiment vs. Simulation, Part 5: Detailed IC Package Model Calibration Methodology
  • CFD – Colourful Friday Distractions
  • Experiment vs. Simulation, Part 4: Compact Thermal Models
  • February 2013
  • Experiment vs. Simulation, Part 3: JESD51-14
  • January 2013
  • Experiment vs. Simulation, Part 2: TIM Thermal Conductivity
  • Experiment vs. Simulation, Part 1: Them and Us.
  • September 2012
  • “Why Cartesian Grids Are Good”
  • August 2012
  • Where’s the Best Place to Put a Radiator in a Room? Part 5: Get a Job
  • Where’s the Best Place to Put a Radiator in a Room? Part 4: Premature Simulation
  • July 2012
  • Where’s the Best Place to Put a Radiator in a Room? Part 3: 13% Better
  • Where’s the Best Place to Put a Radiator in a Room? Part 2: PMV and other TLAs
  • Where’s the Best Place to Put a Radiator in a Room. Part 1: Such Things are Important
  • May 2012
  • Agile software development practices in the Mechanical Analysis Division
  • A Little Goes A Long Way (But A Lot Doesn’t Go Much Further)
  • April 2012
  • More Than Two Decades and Still Going Strong; FloTHERM and FloVENT V9.3 Now Released
  • Simulation Software So Simple Even Teenagers Can Use It
  • February 2012
  • Bottlenecks and Interface Materials; Part 3 – Relieving Thermal Bottlenecks Reduce Temperatures
  • January 2012
  • Bottlenecks and Interface Materials; Part 2 – When TIMs Go Bad
  • Bridging the Simulation Supply Chain; NXP Semiconductors, a Case in Point
  • Bottlenecks and Interface Materials; Part 1 – Great Thermal Bedfellows
  • Emails, more Emails and Jeff Bridges
  • LEDs; The future’s bright and hot.
  • December 2011
  • From Megawatts to Milliwatts; sub-micron scale thermal modelling with FloTHERM
  • November 2011
  • What! All that just for that? The bonkers world of CPU cooling.
  • October 2011
  • Ho, Ho, Ho! Facebook moves to Lapland
  • All Detailed Thermal IC Package Models are Wrong… Probably
  • Underfloor Electric Heating. Part III – Penny wise, pound foolish.
  • August 2011
  • Underfloor Electric Heating. Part II – Infrared Thermography
  • Underfloor Electric Heating. Part I: In by Christmas
  • June 2011
  • Come, meet FloTHERM/VENT/EFD users, learn and enjoy!
  • PC Overclocking and Aftermarket Modding. Part III – Power vs. Frequency?
  • PC Overclocking and Aftermarket Modding. Part II – Liquid Nitrogen Overclocking, How Cool is That?
  • May 2011
  • PC Overclocking and Aftermarket Modding. Part 1 – When Colour Matters.
  • April 2011
  • Desktop PC with Integrated Toaster – As if!
  • Thermal Design Perfection Starts with the use of FloTHERM PACK
  • We Love FloTHERM V9.2
  • Desktop PC with Integrated Toaster – the Future is Now
  • March 2011
  • Do you know the way to San Jose?
  • February 2011
  • Beer Fridge – A Case Study in Thermal Design. Part 6 – Baffles and Bottlenecks
  • January 2011
  • FloEFD HVAC Module – Taking Built Environment CFD Simulation to the Next Level
  • Beer Fridge – A Case Study in Thermal Design. Part 5 – Time for a FloBEER
  • Beer Fridge – A Case Study in Thermal Design. Part 4 – FloBEER
  • Beer Fridge – A Case Study in Thermal Design. Part 3 – Side Up or Upside Down?
  • December 2010
  • Beer Fridge – A Case Study in Thermal Design. Part 2 – TEC Effect
  • November 2010
  • Beer Fridge – A Case Study in Thermal Design. Part 1 – A Gift
  • What Can You Learn When You Turn It On?
  • We Love FloTHERM – 8 Reasons to Upgrade to V9.1
  • October 2010
  • On the Vilification of Smokers
  • Identifying Thermal Bottlenecks and Shortcut Opportunities – Taking Simulation to the Next Level
  • August 2010
  • How many frogs does a horse have?
  • It’s a wireless world! No it isn’t.
  • July 2010
  • Are you using ‘Smart’ in a way I am not familiar with?
  • An Interview With… Clemens Lasance
  • I was led to believe we’d have flying cars by now
  • Red Hot Electronic Thermal Analysis?
  • June 2010
  • The art of modelling using CFD. Part VI – Peripheral Boundary Conditions
  • The art of modelling using CFD. Part V – Grid
  • May 2010
  • The art of modelling using CFD. Part IV – Fans
  • The art of modelling using CFD. Part III – TIGs
  • The art of modelling using CFD. Part II – Grilles
  • The art of modelling using CFD. Part I – What happens if you cross art with science?
  • April 2010
  • How much do ‘U-Value’ good thermal insulation? Part VII – “Ooo, shut that door”
  • “A Faster Horse” – Mentor ‘IDEAS for Mechanical’ driving product development
  • March 2010
  • How much do ‘U-Value’ good thermal insulation? Part VI – revenge of the radiative heat flux
  • IC package representation is central to Electronics Cooling
  • How much do ‘U-Value’ good thermal insulation? Part V
  • February 2010
  • How much do ‘U-Value’ good thermal insulation? Part IV
  • How much do ‘U-Value’ good thermal insulation? Part III
  • How much do ‘U-Value’ good thermal insulation? Part II
  • January 2010
  • How much do ‘U-Value’ good thermal insulation? Part I
  • Keeping the caveman warm – HVAC blog
  • FloVIZ, the free FloTHERM/FloVENT CFD results viewer, try it, it’s free
  • ‘Heat Trees’ – taking a leaf out of natures book
  • The Most Extreme CFD Model Ever Ever – Explained
  • FloTHERM and its new XML neutral file format
  • The Most Extreme CFD Model Ever Ever
  • So, you want to predict component temperatures do you? Part VII
  • December 2009
  • So, you want to predict component temperatures do you? Part VI
  • So, you want to predict component temperatures do you? Part V
  • November 2009
  • A trip to MPH and Top Gear Live
  • So, you want to predict component temperatures do you? Part IV
  • So, you want to predict component temperatures do you? Part III
  • October 2009
  • So, you want to predict component temperatures do you? Part II
  • So, you want to predict component temperatures do you? Part I
  • Underfloor Thermal Insulation; Why? Part III
  • September 2009
  • Underfloor Thermal Insulation; Why? Part II
  • Underfloor Thermal Insulation; Why? Part I
  • Is all Software Rubbish?
  • August 2009
  • Thermatronic Stagnation (nothing to do with male deers)
  • Fractals: Gods Artwork, Part III
  • Thermatrons Must Leave
  • July 2009
  • At the Speed of Heat
  • A Load of HVAC TLAs
  • How-to: Invert your thermal model to good effect
  • Clogged cooling fins, a cautionary tale
  • Invert your thermal model to good effect
  • “I work with computers”
  • Fractals: Gods Artwork, Part II
  • Fractals: Gods Artwork, Part I
  • “All models are wrong, but some are useful” Part V
  • June 2009
  • 3D Electronics Cooling CFD, with FloTHERM, in Pictures
  • Spend some time with FlyGuy
  • “All models are wrong, but some are useful” Part IV
  • Flying
  • “All models are wrong, but some are useful” Part III
  • May 2009
  • “All models are wrong, but some are useful” Part II
  • “All models are wrong, but some are useful” Part I
  • Welcome along!