Latent hero series #514: Getting dewey-eyed about librarians.

A lot in Electrical CAD and manufacturing quality hinges on data accuracy and completeness of the library data. From the carrion-crow-like perch of someone supporting design automation software, the immense and patient contribution of the ECAD librarians is often missed.  

 

A couple of co-inciding recent events brought me to a renewed understanding of the significance of the work librarians do. Those 2 events were a visit to a customer, and  reading a book. The book, I picked up at a church hall used book sale. Quality is Free – the Art of Making Quality Certain. It was first published in paperback in 1980, ISBN 0451624688 by author Philip B. Crosby.

 

This book has a few things going for it, one of which is it is a Mentor publication – but no relation to Mentor Graphics. The Mentor Books – New American Library, is, or at least was then, a sub-division of McGraw Hill Publishing. For a chance encounter it was interesting reading and a good slice of luck. I think it is out of print now. The domain the book covers is general industrial production and as well as offering  plenty of nuggets of straightforward wisdom like “act now for reward later” Crosby goes into convincing detail about the patience required to achieve quality improvements.

 

I like that a librarian themed blog post involves a book. Next time you go into a public library be sure to wish the person behind the counter “Many Happy Returns”

Empowering librarians:

 

A high quality electrical parts library to support wiring designs is achieved first by putting in place the right resources for the right length of time. But a close second is senior management makes the responsibilities of librarians untouchable and uncompromised. Giving librarians the authority and autonomy to manage their domain is highly beneficial. A division of labor has been popular in for profit organizations since mediaeval times. It is a winning formula. Librarians have better expertise and the experience in component data management than harness design engineers for example, who to give them their due are far better and more valuable as designers than the librarians may be. Better quality data in the library is not a finish line to pass and then forget about and go on to the next thing, it is an ongoing commitment.

Comprehensive and complete data.

 

Imagine there is a missing electrical connector in the library. Is the quality problem of the part not being present solved by the part reference being added? If you think at first blush that this is the end, then consider whether for electrical CAD purposes a basic definition really will suffice. Depends what you mean by a “basic” set of information might be your reply. What to include in the set of basic information then? A majority of engineers may want an accurate cross-reference to who the supplier of the part is additional their own internal part numbering system. You want to know where the part can be sourced from. If that part reference, any part reference contains separation or position significance coding, well that’s got to be accurate too for consumers of the data down the line.

 

library-issues-exposed-in-harness-xc-design-log

Yes, accuracy makes a tremendous difference:

 

 

The CHS system has a lengthy list of off-the-shelf design rule checks which can be supplemented through the extensibility features.

The CHS system has a lengthy list of off-the-shelf design rule checks which can be supplemented through the extensibility features.

What’s the difference in the part number  …………..  from supplier

3579246  3589246  35-79246 35-792E6 357924-Blue  …….. Johnson or Johnston or Johnstone or Jonsson.

 

 

It is knowing and handling these subtleties which librarians excel at. Or in CHS, they Capital Library at. (second bad pun of the post).

 

Now the surface has been scratched relating to one or two small pieces beginning a reasonable “basic” subset of data, let’s be bold and examine a few more touch points. What about the CAD symbol or symbols to represent the individual connector? Are they part of the minimum data set you are looking to achieve before you would consider the part to be ready in your database?  

 

  • Alternative suppliers
  • Terminals taken and the wires that are valid for inclusion in the wires and in which cavities these can be inserted.
  • Locking mechanisms attachment methods and strain relief configuration choices.
  • Plugs and sealing parts
  • Conformity to environmental control and recycling/pollution standards
  • Dimensional information.
  • Weight
  • Extract of or link to official specification documents

 

 

Why is this detail important to you?

 

Because parts engineers and librarians are not just people too, they are pivotal to your success.

 

 

 

Simple five level elevator plan.

 

The customer I was visiting has guidelines for different levels of completeness of their library data supporting multiple projects in multiple locations. This is a handy way of breaking down the tasks so that the workflow steps are more manageable. Tasks can be split between locations and resources. Librarian task can be split so blocks of data creation and maintenance can be separated out and resourced with temporary help. Per project this perspective helps you to get to a believable % of task complete measurement.  The levels provide a simple way of organizing and executing harness component data management and infer the metrics which will be used to track progress.

 

The levels are:

1)      Base data and vendor reference data

2)      Design and manufacturing symbol approval

3)      Device transmittal layer (CHS footprint)

4)      Sub-component interrelationships (for example wire >> terminal >> connector)

5)      Models to support electrical simulation/analysis

Being able to measure means you can manage transition from one plateau of accuracy to the next. You can see the dimensions of your data management tasks. You can see it progress to a quality where it supports a high quality design. One of the things I like about this approach is that it acknowledges there is no fixed “minimum” standard. Having the library data good enough to get the job done is not good enough tomorrow when you need different parts information from the library. And then just when you think you have all the information about all the parts you’ll ever need someone will invent some more or want some more data associated with the existing ones or you will get a new product line. The concept of attaining a minimum doesn’t sit easily with the goal of reaching the best quality. 

 

Capital Enterprise Reporter showing some of the levels of information held in CHS Library for parts

 

 

 

 

Capital Enterprise Reporter showing some of the levels of information held in CHS Library for parts

Hurrah for the librarians. They contribute enormously to make the designs perfect.

Post Author

Posted November 19th, 2009, by

Post Tags

, , , , , , , , ,

Post Comments

2 Comments

About Paul Johnston's Blog

Capital is Mentor Graphics' global market-leading software for electrical system design, electrical analysis, system integration, cabling and wiring design, harness engineering and service documentation. My job title is Senior Application Engineer Consultant - that's a subject matter expert label if you don't want to work out what it means. Here are some of my observations and views - comment on them at your pleasure. Paul Johnston's Blog

Comments

2 comments on this post | ↓ Add Your Own

Commented on November 21, 2009 at 4:18 am
By malcolm tucker

Paul,

Welcome and overdue attention to the librarian. A much misunderstood and ignored profession. Ask Philip Larkin. Personally, I blame the parents. However, isn’t there a risk that the perfect becomes the enemy of the good enough?

[...]  Librarians: Without the underpinning of a complete, comprehensive and accurate electro-mechanical library your automation of engineering processes is diluted. [...]

Add Your Comment

Archives

March 2014
  • How to get the best out of your Capital sales person.
  • February 2014
  • The p-word of Capital.
  • November 2013
  • Mentor Communities and IESD – Capital and VeSys
  • March 2013
  • When you should wake up and retire your old software.
  • December 2012
  • All present and correct.
  • November 2012
  • Distance no object – time holds no dread.
  • Who did you see at the exhibition hall?
  • October 2012
  • Alleviating stress, eliminating risk. Because that’s how we roll.
  • January 2012
  • People who plan, prepare and perform.
  • In Capital Deployment – tell me Paul – who’s the worthiest of them all?
  • Keep no Secrets, Inflict no Surprises.
  • December 2011
  • No vacationing during the holidays then.
  • November 2011
  • Strength in diversity, collective effort and the overstretched analogy.
  • April 2011
  • Blunt talking happens at the sharp end.
  • In praise of the trainers.
  • March 2011
  • The things you should “just know” – IESF Detroit and Capital
  • No shock in the new any more.
  • February 2011
  • Listen – IESF 2011 Detroit Date announced as June 2nd 2011.
  • January 2011
  • Secrets no more: Staying or Straying in Programming – Commercially available tools or grow-your-own?
  • Secrets no more: Outsourcing or in-sourcing your electrical systems interconnect software.
  • November 2010
  • Do you have home grown or shop bought electrical interconnect design tools? Part 2:Don’t sit on the sidelines.
  • Build or buy
  • May 2010
  • Two to the power of N = $ saved or spent
  • Under-rated – often under-stated: #348 The Information Systems people
  • April 2010
  • In today’s world of {fill in the blank here} people do business with other people.
  • March 2010
  • IESF Detroit – 10 days from March 18th and counting down.
  • February 2010
  • Latent Hero Series: #277 the Product Manager
  • January 2010
  • Harness Cost Reduction – the movie; appearing now Website remodeled
  • Harness cost calculation: Miseries brought on by false estimates.
  • IESF – A different decade-type milestone. Scoop!
  • Predictions for twenty-teens Part 3: What will be different about wiring harnesses in the next 10 years.
  • Forecast for 2010 to 2020 Part 2: What will be different about business processes in engineering wiring harnesses in the next ten years.
  • Looking ahead in a new decade predictions Part 1: Winners will leverage the best technologies.
  • December 2009
  • More songs – the new Aerospace and Automotive Electrical and Electronic Systems Design Hit Parade
  • DSI – interfacing with design systems afterword.
  • A standard you can keep to. Perhaps longer than you want.
  • Standards are good – simple standards live longer.
  • November 2009
  • The little pieces of knowledge joined with the bigger ones.
  • Latent hero series #514: Getting dewey-eyed about librarians.
  • September 2009
  • International harmony
  • Show and tell
  • August 2009
  • Learn all about it.
  • July 2009
  • In praise of systems engineering.
  • June 2009
  • CHS: What has it to do with community and abiotic environments?
  • Choose wisely and once: Part 5 – Interoperability.
  • Choose wisely and once: Part 4 – CAD outputs.
  • Choose wisely and once – Part 3: Business Benefits
  • Perceptions differ
  • Choose wisely and once – Part 2: A model & it is looking good.
  • Be careful what you ask for. Choose wisely and once – Part 1.
  • Saving time is saving money. The half year review.
  • May 2009
  • Charleston International Airport
  • Zen thought for the day: For CHS customers, change is a constant.
  • The pursuit of perfection: enhancement requests for CHS.
  • The Electrical Systems Design Blog Song Contest – Top 10
  • Integrated Electrical and Electronic Systems Conference – IESF x 2
  • Things move quickly
  • Start with the end in mind