Analog Modeling – Part 1

I recently spent some time rummaging around my basement. I suppose my basement is not unlike many others — it’s kind of my family’s catch-all storage place for items too big to fit in a closet. Besides housing my HVAC and water heating systems, my basement is home to a variety of holiday decorations, lots of canned, bottled, and bulk food items, a small collection of mismatched folding tables and chairs, a few carpet remnants from a recent remodeling project, and the “archive” section of my personal library. I say “archive” since the stacks of books in my basement are the overflow from the stacks in my office. Yeah, I love books, and my large and diverse collection is a virtual window into my rather broad range of interests — probably too broad for my own good. My book-buying mantra is “you can never have too much reference material”. When I add a book to my library, it has a permanent home; selling or giving away any of them is a bit like abandoning a trusted friend. I’ll be the first to admit that books are a bit of an obsession for me, but I digress…

A downside of having so many books is that I sometimes forget what titles I have. Having finished my basement rummage, I was on my way back upstairs when a long forgotten little green book caught my eye: Engineering Formulas, 7th Edition, by Kurt and Reiner Gieck. I inherited this tiny yet information packed volume a decade or so ago from my dad’s personal reference library. The book covers a broad range of engineering topics including statics, dynamics, thermodynamics, electricity, and controls, just to name a few. While it’s not meant to be a detailed mathematical tome on all things engineering, it is a pretty good primer for new topics, and a reasonable review for subjects I haven’t worked in for awhile. For me, it was a great re-discovery and will no doubt be a handy reference when I need to research analog device operation before creating a model.

Before simulation there has to be modeling, and analog modeling starts with a mathematical description of behavior. I know this isn’t rocket science, but in the crunch of a hectic design schedule, it’s easy to forget that behind every symbol in a simulatable schematic there has to be some sort of mathematical model, and inside every mathematical model there is at least one equation. It’s pretty hard to overstate the importance of equations to the modeling and simulation process. If your simulation results look good, chances are a quality set of equations helped determine the answer. If your simulation results look wacky, equations could easily be the problem. In short, quality of simulation results is directly related to the quality of device equations. Getting the equations right is an important first step toward simulation results that make sense.

Selecting device equations is a bit of a subjective process. The equations you select or derive to describe a device’s behavior may well be different from those I would choose. A lot of this has to do with the information, technology, and modeling experience we have at hand. But selecting equations is only the beginning of the modeling process. With equations in hand, the next big hurdle is figuring out how to turn them into a viable simulation model. A bad implementation of even excellent equations can cause simulation problems. In coming blog posts I’ll suggest some general guidelines to help you turn device equations into useful VHDL-AMS simulation models.

Next in this Analog Modeling series: Analog Modeling – Part 2

Post Author

Posted January 25th, 2012, by

Post Tags

, , , , ,

Post Comments

No Comments

About Mike Jensen's Blog

Views, insights, and commentary on mechatronic system design and analysis. Mike Jensen's Blog

Comments

Add Your Comment

Archives

October 2014
  • Reliability vs Robustness
  • June 2014
  • Wow Factor
  • May 2014
  • SystemVision 5.10.3
  • March 2014
  • IESF 2014: Military & Aerospace
  • Engineering Oops!
  • Big Engineering
  • January 2014
  • SystemVision Model Wizard
  • December 2013
  • SystemVision 5.10.2
  • Modeling: An Engineer’s Dilemma
  • October 2013
  • What is Your Legacy?
  • September 2013
  • Automotive IESF 2013
  • July 2013
  • Simple Design Solutions
  • June 2013
  • SystemVision 5.10
  • May 2013
  • Engineering Muscle Memory
  • EDA vs. Windows 8
  • March 2013
  • VHDL-AMS Stress Modeling – Part 3
  • January 2013
  • VHDL-AMS Stress Modeling – Part 2
  • VHDL-AMS Stress Modeling – Part 1
  • December 2012
  • Practice! Practice!
  • November 2012
  • Sharing Tool Expertise
  • October 2012
  • Preserving Expertise
  • Virtual Prototyping — Really?
  • Innovations in Motion Control Design
  • September 2012
  • Game Changers
  • Do We Overdesign?
  • August 2012
  • Tsunami Remnants
  • July 2012
  • A New Look at Device Modeling
  • SystemVision 5.9
  • June 2012
  • Veyron Physics
  • May 2012
  • Rooster Tail Engineering
  • April 2012
  • Automotive IESF 2012
  • Teaching and Learning CAN Bus
  • March 2012
  • Analog Modeling – Part 6
  • Analog Modeling – Part 5
  • Analog Modeling – Part 4
  • February 2012
  • Analog Modeling – Part 3
  • Analog Modeling – Part 2
  • January 2012
  • Analog Modeling – Part 1
  • Connecting Tools and Processes
  • December 2011
  • Turning-Off and Tuning-In
  • Use vs. Experience
  • Analyzing the Big Picture
  • November 2011
  • Simulating for Reliability
  • October 2011
  • SystemVision 5.8
  • VHDL-AMS Model Portability — Fact or Fiction?
  • September 2011
  • IESF 2011 Moves to Frankfurt
  • Simulation Troubleshooting
  • August 2011
  • Qualities of VHDL-AMS Quantities
  • Military & Aerospace IESF 2011
  • Touring Johnson Space Center
  • July 2011
  • Engineering versus Science
  • June 2011
  • System Reengineering
  • May 2011
  • Integrating Hardware and Software Design
  • Engine Remote Start
  • Integrated System Design
  • Simulation Experiments (Part 3)
  • April 2011
  • Automotive IESF 2011
  • Pushbutton Cars
  • System Simulation with FEA-Base Motor Models
  • March 2011
  • Simulation Experiments (Part 2)
  • Simulation Experiments (Part 1)
  • Japan: Patience and Grace Amid Disaster
  • Top Gear = Driving Fun
  • February 2011
  • Buoyancy
  • Ideas in Motion
  • January 2011
  • The Mechanical Half of Mechatronics
  • Detroit Auto Show
  • Signal-flow vs Conserved System Modeling
  • SystemVision 5.7…Ready, Set, Go!
  • December 2010
  • SystemVision and Windows 7
  • Friction Vacation
  • Simulation Beyond Volts and Amps (Part 4)
  • November 2010
  • Simulation Beyond Volts and Amps (Part 3)
  • Simulation Beyond Volts and Amps (Part 2)
  • Simulation Beyond Volts and Amps (Part 1)
  • October 2010
  • SAE Convergence Recap (and an Unexpected Surprise)
  • VHDL-AMS Black Belt
  • Converging on SAE Convergence
  • System Design vs System Repair
  • September 2010
  • What’s the “AMS” in VHDL-AMS?
  • How Sensitive is Your System?
  • Do You Trust Your Simulator?
  • August 2010
  • What’s in a SPICE Model?
  • Cycling + Gravity = Pain
  • NI Week: Fun for Engineers
  • June 2010
  • Are You a Flexible Thinker?
  • VHDL-AMS and Switch Hysteresis
  • May 2010
  • VHDL-AMS Revisited
  • Segway to U3-X
  • Atomic Glue
  • March 2010
  • IESF Recap
  • February 2010
  • IESF is Coming…
  • System Level HDL-topia
  • January 2010
  • Mastering Design Abstraction
  • The Joy of Disassembly