Pinpointing a Problem

The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) in the U.S., investigating the cause of a fire on a Boeing Dreamliner 787 parked at Boston Logan Airport in January, transitioned its work from a macroscopic study to a microscopic examination, including chemical and elemental analysis of the areas of internal short circuiting and thermal damage. Soon after launching a microscopic investigation, NTSB officials pinpointed the cause of the fire: a lithium-ion (Li-ion) battery.

Now that other avionics onboard the 787 have been ruled out as the cause of the fire, attentions turn to the entire battery structure. In the course of their investigation into the cause of the initiating short circuit, the NTSB is dissecting the battery and carefully scrutinizing each internal and external component.

NTSB Chairman Deborah A.P. Hersman said that potential causes of the initiating short circuit currently being evaluated include: battery charging, the design and construction of the battery, and the possibility of defects introduced during the manufacturing process.

NTSB personnel first ruled out mechanical impact damage to the battery and external short circuiting as the cause. They also concluded that the deformation of and electrical arcing on the battery case were not related to the cause, but rather occurred as a result of the battery malfunction.

“There were short circuits in cells of the battery and there was a thermal runaway in the battery, multiple cells where we saw uncontrolled chemical chain reaction,” Hersman explains. “Those features are not what we would have expected to see in a brand-new battery in a brand-new airplane.”

Post Author

Posted February 27th, 2013, by

Post Tags

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Post Comments

2 Comments

About J. VanDomelen Mil/Aero Blog

J. VanDomelen holds a Bachelor of Science in Information Systems and myriad certifications from Microsoft, Cisco, and CompTia in varying facets of computer software, hardware, and network design and implementation. He has worked in the electronics industry for more than 12 years in varied fields, including advanced systems design of highly technical military and aerospace computer systems, semiconductor manufacturing, open source software development, hardware design, and rapid prototyping. J. VanDomelen Mil/Aero Blog

@JLVanDo tweets

  • RT @coho: I <3 #Dallas, #LongBeach & @WAAerospace -- heck, I'd follow (stalk) the @mentor_graphics @IESF_Conference around the US, if I had…
  • RT @IESF_Conference: Registered for IESF yet? Upcoming event locations include Dallas, Everett & Long Beach. Did we mention free lunch? htt…
  • @coho @mentor_graphics Count @JLVanDo in that number. Perhaps a tour bus and we follow @IESF_Conference around the US.

Follow JLVanDo

Comments

2 comments on this post | ↓ Add Your Own

Commented on February 27, 2013 at 11:20 am
By Sometimes Smaller is Better « J. VanDomelen Mil/Aero Blog

[...] especially those of safety specialists, have been on Boeing and the avionics employed by its Dreamliner 787 since a Japan Airlines (JAL) commercial airplane caught fire in Boston last [...]

Commented on February 28, 2013 at 10:31 am
By Scrutinizing Certifications « J. VanDomelen Mil/Aero Blog

[...] have on the battery. In tests to validate these assessments, Boeing engineers found no evidence of cell-to-cell propagation or fire, both of which occurred in the JAL [...]

Add Your Comment

Archives