These Aren’t the Droids You’re Looking For…..Yet.
Android is sexy, as are the ever-increasing number of smartphones and PC tablets that take advantage of Google’s operating system (OS). Military personnel, even officials at the highest ranks, agree. Soldiers want to use Android devices and Apple’s iPad in the field, while on a mission, communicating, socializing, killing time, or blowing off steam.
Soldiers have historically been frustrated by the inability to employ popular, commercial technologies and devices in military environments. Military personnel have lamented “stepping back into the 1950s” when they set foot on a base or the battlefield.
They have longed for mission rehearsal, simulation, and training systems that deliver the same high-end graphics, fidelity, and responsiveness as Microsoft’s Xbox or Sony’s Playstation. They have endured the longtime use of VHS tape to capture and share video imagery. They’ve previously seen their iPods, MP3 players, and USB flash/thumb drives banned.
Now, however, they are getting iPads and Android tablets. Are these commercial devices—which, by all accounts, have not been tested to and do not adhere to military standards for ruggedization, security, and more—ready for prime time on the battlefield?
The US Department of Defense (DoD) seems to think so. The US Army in September issued a solicitation for roughly a half-million dollars worth of iPads, protective cases, and protection/insurance plans. The US military isn’t alone. Military personnel in the UK are training on iPads at the Royal School of Artillery in Wiltshire. Even a military unit of the Russian Federal Security Service is rumored to have illegally ordered two iPads.
I’m a computer geek. I own Apple products. I’ve built many a computer system, a majority of them architected for military use. I’m not sure I would entrust military missions and lives to an iPad. Not right now, anyway, and not without serious ruggedization. Android devices, however… well, that’s another story. Stay tuned!
More Blog Posts
Add Your Comment
About J. VanDomelen Mil/Aero Blog
J. VanDomelen holds a Bachelor of Science in Information Systems and myriad certifications from Microsoft, Cisco, and CompTia in varying facets of computer software, hardware, and network design and implementation. He has worked in the electronics industry for more than 12 years in varied fields, including advanced systems design of highly technical military and aerospace computer systems, semiconductor manufacturing, open source software development, hardware design, and rapid prototyping.
- To Infinity and Beyond
- Warp Factor 10, Mr. Sulu
- Bombardier Steps Up to the Big Boys
- Suborbital Solicitations
- Wanted: Suborbital Flight Technology Payloads & Capabilities
- Gas Guzzlers Galore
- April 2013 (5)
- March 2013 (5)
- February 2013 (5)
- January 2013 (5)
- December 2012 (5)
- November 2012 (5)
- October 2012 (5)
- September 2012 (5)
- August 2012 (5)
- July 2012 (6)
- June 2012 (4)
- May 2012 (5)
- April 2012 (5)
- March 2012 (5)
- February 2012 (4)
- January 2012 (4)
- December 2011 (5)
- November 2011 (5)
- October 2011 (5)
- September 2011 (5)
- August 2011 (5)
- July 2011 (5)
- June 2011 (5)
- May 2011 (5)
- Mil/Aero Industry Health: A Matter of National Concern
- Washington State Moves to Bolster Aerospace Market – Aerospace Industry Investment, Part III
- Washington Ponies up Cash for Aerospace Training — Aerospace Industry Investment, Part II
- Washington Losing Aerospace Business and Clout? — Aerospace Industry Investment, Part I
- Fiery Death from the Heavens?
- April 2011 (5)
- March 2011 (5)
- February 2011 (5)
- January 2011 (4)
- December 2010 (5)
- November 2010 (5)
- October 2010 (5)
- September 2010 (6)
- Are You Kidding Me? Make Another One?
- Flash Gordon Eat Your Heart Out – Is the Ray-gun a Reality?
- Doing More with Less, Multitasking Engineers.
- Nothing Wrong with a Little Competition, Part 2
- Nothing Wrong with a Little Competition, Part 1
- Geeks and Engineers Funding and Forging the Private Space Industry
- August 2010 (4)
- July 2010 (4)
- June 2010 (5)
- May 2010 (5)
- April 2010 (5)